Stranahan Lecture Series - Past Speakers
The Stranahan Lecture Series is part of the Stranahan National Issues Forum and is sponsored by the College of Law and its chapter of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies. Below is an outline of previous lectures, including links to event recordings.
2024
"A Conversation on the Future of Higher Education After SFFA V. Harvard"
Tuesday, April 9 | Noon-1 p.m.
Ange-Marie Hancock & Devon Westhill
Affirmative actions have long been an established - though controversial - aspect of higher education. Last summer, the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard, upended long-standing precedent to significantly restrict the use of race in affirmative action in student admissions, and perhaps elsewhere in higher education.
Join us for a conversation with Dr. Ange-Marie Hancock and Mr. Devon Westhill as they share their different perspectives on the future of higher education in light of SFFA v. Harvard.
Ange-Marie Hancock is executive director of the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at The Ohio State University, where she also serves as ENGIE-Axium Endowed Professor of Political Science. She has written three books on the intersections of categories of difference like race, gender, class, sexuality and citizenship and their impact on policy: the award-winning “The Politics of Disgust and the Public Identity of the ‘Welfare Queen’” (2004), “Solidarity Politics for Millennials: A Guide to Ending the Oppression Olympics” (2011) and “Intersectionality: An Intellectual History” (2016). She is hard at work on her fourth book, “The Scope and Vision of African American Political Thought,” a book that covers more than 250 years of African American political thought. She received a bachelor’s degree from New York University, and her M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Devon Westhill is the president and general counsel of the nonpartisan, nonprofit Center for Equal Opportunity. An attorney focused on matters of constitutional and civil rights, he researches, speaks, and writes about civil rights, civil liberties, and related issues such as race relations, social change, and equal opportunity. Mr. Westhill has also provided expert testimony to both houses of the U.S. Congress, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Immediately prior to his current role, Mr. Westhill led the civil rights office at the U.S. Department of Agriculture as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. He has also worked at the U.S. Department of Labor, Federalist Society, and as a criminal trial lawyer in private practice. Mr. Westhill is a U.S. Navy veteran with degrees from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Florida.
The conversation will be moderated by Lee Strang, John W. Stoepler Professor of Law & Values and Director of the Institute of American Constitutional Thought & Leadership. Following their conversation, there will be a Q&A
Justice Melody J. Stewart and Justice R. Patrick DeWine
Ohio Supreme Court
"A Conversation with Supreme Court Justices on the Ohio Constitution"
Jan. 30, 2024
Ohio’s Constitution was adopted in 1851, and it has had significant amendments since then. How do we interpret the Ohio Constitution? What role does it play in Ohio’s government? What does it mean to the lives of everyday Ohioans? Should it be changed? Justice Melody J. Stewart and Justice R. Patrick DeWine discussed how the state constitution impacts our government and the people of Ohio.
Justice Stewart was elected in Nov. 2018, to a full term as the 161st Justice to serve on the Ohio Supreme Court. Prior to that, she served on the Eighth District Court of Appeals – elected to an unexpired term in 2006 and twice re-elected to full terms. While there, she was assigned to hear cases in other appellate districts and on the Ohio Supreme Court. Justice Stewart earned her law degree from the College of Law at Cleveland State University, and her Ph.D. from Case Western Reserve University. She was also awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree from Cleveland State University.
Justice DeWine was re-elected to a second term on the Ohio Supreme Court in Nov. 2022. He has served at all levels of the Ohio judiciary. Prior to his election to the Supreme Court, Justice DeWine served on the First District Court of Appeals. He has also served as a Hamilton County Commissioner and a member of Cincinnati City Council. Justice DeWine received his juris doctor from the University of Michigan Law School, Order of the Coif.
Ange-Marie Hancock (Executive Director of the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at
The Ohio State University) and Devon Westhill (President and General counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity)
"A Conversation on the Future of Higher Education After SFFA v. Harvard"
April 9, 2024
Affirmative actions have long been an established - though controversial - aspect of higher education. Last summer, the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard, upended long-standing precedent to significantly restrict the use of race in affirmative action in student admissions, and perhaps elsewhere in higher education. Dr. Ange-Marie Hancock and Mr. Devon Westhill shared their different perspectives on the future of higher education in light of SFFA v. Harvard.
Ange-Marie Hancock is executive director of the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at The Ohio State University, where she also serves as ENGIE-Axium Endowed Professor of Political Science. She has written three books on the intersections of categories of difference like race, gender, class, sexuality and citizenship and their impact on policy. She received a bachelor’s degree from New York University, and her M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Devon Westhill is the president and general counsel of the nonpartisan, nonprofit Center for Equal Opportunity. An attorney focused on matters of constitutional and civil rights, he researches, speaks, and writes about civil rights, civil liberties, and related issues such as race relations, social change, and equal opportunity. Mr. Westhill is a U.S. Navy veteran with degrees from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Florida.
2023
The Honorable James C. Ho
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
"Fair-Weather Originalism: Judges, Umpires, and the Fear of Being Booed"
April 11, 2023
How can a judge be faithful to the Constitution and the rule of law? Judge James C. Ho arguded that fidelity to the Constitution requires principled originalism. Contrary to common assumption, he explained how principled originalists need strong moral character, not just raw intelligence, in order to fulfill their oaths. Judge Ho defended the use of originalism as a process that can overcome partisan lines.
Judge Ho sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Before taking the bench in 2018, he was a partner and co-chair of the national Appellate and Constitutional Law practice group of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. As an appellate litigator for over a decade, Judge Ho presented 50 oral arguments in federal and state courts nationwide. His record of public service also includes appointments as vice chair of the Federal Judicial Evaluation Committee in Texas and co-chair of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association Judiciary Committee, and as a member of the U.S. Magistrate Judge Merit Selection Panel for the Northern District of Texas, the U.S. delegation to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and the Continuity of Government Commission.
2022
Eric R. Claeys
Professor of Law, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School
"Natural Rights and Property"
April 4, 2022
Professor Eric R. Claeys made the case for protecting private property as a natural right in American law and public policy. He illustrated with the recent case, Campo v. United States, in which a federal court consulted many authorities - including John Locke and James Madison - to hold that fishermen have constitutionally protected property in rights to harvest oysters.
A prolific scholar, Claeys's lecture introduced material from his forthcoming book "Natural Property Rights" (Cambridge Univ. Press, forthcoming 2023). He publishes widely on natural rights and property law. He is a member of the American Law Institute (ALI) and is involved in ongoing projects of the ALI on property and copyright. Professor Claeys received his A.B. from Princeton University and his J.D. from the University of Southern California Law School. After law school, Professor Claeys clerked for the Hon. Melvin Brunetti, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the Hon. William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States. He has also taught at Saint Louis University School of Law, the University of Chicago Law School, and Harvard Law School.
Adrian Vermeule
Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
"Reviving the Classical Legal Tradition: Common Good Constitutionalism"
Sept. 13, 2022
What is the classical legal tradition and what relevance does it have for American public law today? Professor Adrian Vermeule suggested that the tradition is still very much with us, and that it helps to make sense of the Founders’ jurisprudential commitments and our current public law. He argued that the classical tradition both can and should be explicitly recovered to improve American public law and legal theory.
Adrian Vermeule is the Ralph S. Tyler Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard Law School and serves on the Council of the Administrative Conference of the United States. He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2012. One of the most prolific scholars in the legal academy, he is the author or co-author of eleven books, and his most recent is "Common Good Constitutionalism" (Polity Books 2022).
Stephen E. Sachs
Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
"Originalism and Original Sins: Reevaluating the Founding"
Oct. 17, 2022
Along with the rise of originalism in American law, the past few decades have seen a broad moral reevaluation of the founding era. How should American lawyers and citizens approach the Constitution and its authors? Professor Sachs discussed how we should understand the Founders’ historical legacy and how the Constitution they wrote might remain binding today, in law and also in conscience.
Stephen E. Sachs is the Antonin Scalia Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where he teaches civil procedure, conflict of laws, and seminars on constitutional law. His research focuses on the law and theory of constitutional interpretation, the jurisdiction of state and federal courts, the history of procedure and private law and the role of the general common law in the U.S. legal system. He is an elected member of the American Law Institute (ALI), an adviser to the ALI’s project on the "Restatement of the Law (Third), Conflict of Laws," and a founding member of the Academic Freedom Alliance. Sachs previously taught at Duke University School of Law and was a visiting professor at the University of Chicago Law School. Before entering academia, he practiced in the Washington, D.C., litigation group of Mayer Brown LLP, and he clerked for Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., as well as for Judge Stephen F. Williams of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
2021
Judge Amul Thapar
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
"Innovative Ideas for Criminal Justice Reform"
Sept. 28, 2021
Judge Amul Thapar discussed proposals for criminal justice reform based on his experiences as a United States attorney and a district court judge. His ideas aimed to promote public safety, reduce recidivism, and give defendants more agency over the criminal process.
Thapar is a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judge and is the first South Asian Article III judge. President George W. Bush nominated him to the district court on May 24, 2007, and President Donald J. Trump nominated him to the Sixth Circuit on March 21, 2017. Before becoming a judge, Thapar served as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky. He was appointed to the Attorney General's Advisory Committee (AGAC) and chaired the AGAC's Controlled Substances and Asset Forfeiture subcommittee. He also served on the Terrorism and National Security subcommittee, the Violent Crime subcommittee, and the Child Exploitation working group. In 2015, Judge Thapar received the Daniel K. Inouye Trailblazer Award from the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association. That same year, he received a Green Bag award for his opinion in Wagner v. Sherwin-Williams Co. Civil No. 14-178-ART (E.D. Ky. Apr. 29, 2015). He teaches at the University of Virginia School of Law, Vanderbilt Law School, and Notre Dame Law School. Judge Thapar received his B.S. from Boston College and his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley. He grew up in Sylvania and Ottawa Hills, Ohio.
2019
Keith Whittington
William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics, Princeton University
"Why We Should Value Campus Free Speech"
March 20, 2019
Professor Keith Whittington spoke on the importance of free speech at universities as argued in his award-winning recent book, Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech. Whittington will explained the need to protect free speech at universities to enhance the mission of assembling and nurturing an open and diverse community of scholars, teachers, and students. Whittington examined how relationships between the critical functions of the university and the principles of free speech can help resolve difficult challenges that confront modern universities.
A prolific scholar, his publications include nine books and dozens of articles and essays on constitutional law, politics, and history, and American political thought. He is a fellow with the National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement, and is a member of the American Academy of the Arts and Sciences. The winner of numerous book, scholarly, and teaching awards, Whittington completed his undergraduate degree at The University of Texas at Austin, and earned his PhD in political science at Yale University.
Ilya Somin
Professor of Law, George Mason University
"Free to Move: Foot Voting and Political Freedom"
Sept. 12, 2019
Most Americans think of ballot box voting as the essence of political freedom. However, Professor Ilya Somin explained how we can best empower ordinary people by expanding opportunities for them to "vote with their feet," whether it be in the private sector, between jurisdictions in a federal system, or even by moving to a new nation. We can greatly enhance both liberty and happiness by limiting and decentralizing political power, and by reducing barriers to both domestic and international migration.
Professor Somin is a Professor of Law at George Mason University. His research focuses on constitutional law, property law, and the study of popular political participation. A prolific scholar, Somin is the author of a number of books including Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter (Stanford University Press, rev. ed., 2016), as well as dozens of scholarly articles and essays in a variety of popular press outlets, including the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times. He has been quoted or interviewed in Time, CBS, MSNBC, and NPR, among other media. Somin is a graduate of Amherst College, Harvard University, and Yale Law School.
2018
Kurt T. Lash
E. Claiborne Robins Distinguished Chair in Law, The University of Richmond
"A Troubled Birth of Freedom: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Struggle to Secure the
Victory of the Civil War"
March 20, 2018
Professor Kurt Lash discussed the Fourteenth Amendment’s historical context, the legal
thinking behind its drafting, the struggle to reach agreement in the 39th Congress,
challenges during ratification, questions over whether the ratification votes of the
southern states should be counted, and the (partial) revolution in constitutional
structure effected by the Amendment.
Lash is one of the nation’s leading scholars on constitutional law and history. He is the founder and director of the Richmond Program on the American Constitution. Professor Lash’s books include The Reconstruction Amendments: Essential Documents (two volumes) (under contract with University of Chicago Press), The American First Amendment in the Twenty-first Century: Cases and Materials (Foundation Press, 2014) (with Van Alstyne), The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges or Immunities of American Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2014), and The Lost History of the Ninth Amendment (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Saikrishna B. Prakash
James Monroe Distinguished Professor of Law and Paul G. Mahoney Research Professor
of Law, The University of Virginia
"Executive Power in the Age of Trump"
Aug. 30, 2018
Professor Saikrishna Prakash discussed why modern executives claim the ability to
alter constitutional and statutory law through the alchemy of repeated transgressions
of existing law. He argued this ability has contributed to President Trump's dominant
role in constitutional and statutory interpretation.
The author of over 60 articles, Professor Prakash is a leading scholar of constitutional law and legal history. His recent publications include "50 States, 50 Attorneys General and 50 Approaches to the Duty to Defend" (Yale Law Journal, 2015), "The Imbecilic Executive" (Virginia Law Review, 2013), "The Sweeping Domestic War Powers of Congress" (Michigan Law Review, 2015), and Imperial from the Beginning: The Constitution of the Original Executive (Yale University Press, 2015). Prakash teaches constitutional law, foreign relations law, and presidential powers. He is a graduate of Stanford University and Yale Law School, and he clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas.
2017
David Skeel
S. Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate Law, University of Pennsylvania
"When is Bankruptcy the Answer for Troubled Cities and States?"
March 16, 2017
Professor Skeel addressed municipal and state bankruptcy as well as its causes and
solutions. He identified the extent of governmental indebtedness and its many causes.
Professor Skeel also explained current avenues—and obstacles—within the bankruptcy
code for municipal and state bankruptcy, drawing upon his experience as one of five
members of the federally-appointed board overseeing Puerto Rico’s debt crisis.
A scholar and prolific writer, Skeel's expertise lies in the areas of corporate law,
bankruptcy, and religion and the law. In addition to numerous articles, he has published
four books: True Paradox: How Christianity Makes Sense of Our Complex World (InterVarsity, 2014); The New Financial Deal: Understanding the Dodd-Frank Act and Its (Unintended) Consequences
(Wiley, 2011); Icarus in the Boardroom (Oxford, 2005); and Debt’s Dominion: A History of Bankruptcy Law in America (Princeton, 2001). He has also frequently appeared in the press with commentaries
appearing in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and The Weekly Standard.
Nicole Stelle Garnett
John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame
"The Continuing Transformation of K-12 Education Law: Beyond Vouchers and Charter Schools"
Sept. 21, 2017
Professor Garnett explained how changes to K-12 education resulted from education reformers embracing a child-focused, rather than a sector-focused, reform agenda. This reform agenda’s central goal is maximizing the number of high-quality educational options for disadvantaged children across charter, private, and traditional public schools. The transformation of K-12 education may have profound implications for education law, including opening the possibility of faith-based, state-supported charter schools.
A well-known scholar of education and property law, Garnett has published two books in these areas: Lost Classrooms, Lost Community: Catholic Schools’ Importance in Urban America (University of Chicago Press 2014), and Ordering the City: Land Use, Policing and the Restoration of Urban America (Yale University Press 2009). She is also widely published in leading law reviews and teaches courses in property, education, local government, and land use planning law at Notre Dame. She earned her BA from Stanford University and her JD from Yale Law School and was a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
2016
Stuart Taylor, Jr.
Author and freelance writer
"Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It’s Intended to Help, and Why Universities
Won’t Admit It"
Feb. 3, 2016
Taylor is an author and freelance writer focusing on legal and policy issues, and a Brookings Institution senior fellow. In 2012, Richard Sander and Taylor co-authored the book, Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It’s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won’t Admit It. In 2007, Taylor and KC Johnson co-authored the book, Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Fraud.
Taylor was a reporter for The New York Times from 1980-1988, for The American Lawyer, Legal Times, and their affiliates from 1989-1997, and for National Journal and Newsweek from 1998 through 2010. He has also written for The Atlantic, The New Republic, National Review, Slate, The Daily Beast, Harper’s, Reader’s Digest, and other magazines, plus op-eds for The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, and USA Today. Taylor holds an AB from Princeton University and a JD from Harvard Law School.
John O. McGinnis
George C. Dix Professor in Constitutional Law, Northwestern University
"Why Citizens United and Other Roberts Court Campaign Finance Decisions are Right"
April 4, 2016
No issue has generated more unyielding divisions on the Roberts Supreme Court and
in American society than the Court's decisions about political campaign regulation,
most famously in Citizens United v. FEC (2010). The Court's majority believes that campaign finance regulations should be
analyzed under general free speech principles established in other contexts. The dissents
seek to decide campaign finance regulation issues by considerations unique to campaign
finance regulation. Professor McGinnis showed that the majority's approach is correct,
because the First Amendment reflects a distrust of government and thus requires judicial
constraint, which adherence to general First Amendment principles provides.
John M. Finnis
Emeritus Professor, University of Oxford and Biolchini Family Professor of Law, University
of Notre Dame
"A Conversation with Professor John Finnis"
Sept. 20, 2016
Professor Finnis explained natural law and some of its important implications.
Finnis is a prolific scholar. He has authored and edited numerous books and written dozens of articles and essays. He was honored when Oxford University Press published his collected works in a five-volume series. Professor Finnis’ publications have focused on law, legal theory, moral and political philosophy, theology, and late Elizabethan-era history. Until 2010, Finnis held positions of lecturer, reader, and a chaired professor in law at Oxford. He has also held positions at the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Malawi in Africa, and at Boston College of Law. He earned his LLB from Adelaide University in Australia and doctorate from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar. He is admitted to the English Bar, Gray’s Inn.
2015
Jonathan H. Adler
Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Business Law
and Regulation, Case Western Reserve University
"Conservative Conservation: Property Rights and Environmental Protection"
March 26, 2015
Professor Adler challenged the premises upon which conventional approaches to environmental protection are based. He argued that greater concern for property rights can provide the foundation for environmental protection that is more effective and equitable.
Adler is the author or editor of five books and more than a dozen book chapters. His
articles have appeared in the most influential legal and popular publications in the
nation ranging from the Harvard Environmental Law Review and Supreme Court Economic Review, to The Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Adler is a contributing editor to National Review Online and a regular contributor
to the popular legal blog, "The Volokh Conspiracy," hosted by washingtonpost.com.
A regular commentator on constitutional and regulatory issues, he has appeared on
numerous radio and television programs, ranging from PBS "Newshour with Jim Lehrer"
and NPR's "Talk of the Nation," to Fox News Channel's "O'Reilly Factor" and "Entertainment
Tonight." He has testified before Congress a dozen times and his work has been cited
in the U.S. Supreme Court. Adler holds a BA from Yale University and a JD from George
Mason University School of Law.
David Harris
Distinguished Faculty Scholar and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh
"A Conversation on Policing and Race in Post-Ferguson America"- Part I
Sept. 10, 2015
Since the events in Ferguson, Missouri, Americans have seen a steady stream of incidents
replayed through video that raise uncomfortable questions about policing in this country.
In the first lecture of a two-part series, Professor David Harris offered his thoughts
on racial profiling and various means available to curb police misconduct.
Professor Harris is the leading national authority on racial profiling. His law journal articles about profiling became the basis for the Traffic Stops Statistics Act of 1997, the first national legislative proposal to attempt to address profiling. His 2002 book, Profiles in Injustice: Why Racial Profiling Cannot Work, and his research on profiling led to reform efforts by the federal government, by more than half the states, and by hundreds of police departments. He has testified numerous times in the U.S. Congress and before state legislative bodies. His other books include Good Cops: The Case for Preventive Policing (2005) and Failed Evidence: Why Law Enforcement Resists Science (2012).
Harris taught at The University of Toledo College of Law through 2007, where he was
the Eugene Balk Professor of Law and Values. He holds a BA from Northwestern University,
a JD from Yale Law School, and an LLM from Georgetown University.
Heather Mac Donald
Thomas W. Smith Fellow, Manhattan Institute and Contributing Editor, City Journal
"A Conversation on Policing and Race in Post-Ferguson America"- Part II
Nov. 2, 2015
In the second lecture, Heather Mac Donald responded to Professor Harris and examined
the claims of the Black Lives Matter Movement. She argued that police departments
are the government agencies most dedicated to the proposition that black lives matter
by explaining the policing revolution of the 1990s and looking at race, crime, and
policing statistics.
Mac Donald's work at City Journal has canvassed a range of topics including homeland security, immigration, policing and racial profiling, homelessness and homeless advocacy, and educational policy. Her writings have also appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, The New York Times, and The New Republic. She is a frequent guest on FOX News, CNN, and other television and radio programs.
Mac Donald is the author of several books. Her second book, Are Cops Racist? (2003), investigates the workings of the police, racial profiling, and also the anti-profiling lobby's harmful effects on black Americans. She has frequently testified before Congress. She holds a BA from Yale University, an MA from Cambridge University, and a JD from Stanford University Law School.
2014
Ross Douthat
The New York Times op-ed columnist, author, and blogger
“Finding the Voice of Modern Conservatism: Between Ted Cruz and Chris Christie”
Feb. 19, 2014
Douthat explored the range of modern conservative opinion and how its competing voices manifest themselves in politics, law, and society. He considered various perspectives on such issues as the recent government shutdown, the Affordable Care Act, and the role of religion in society, and considered how conservatism can reclaim the moral high ground in contemporary discourse.
New York Times bestselling author Douthat’s most recent book is Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics (Free Press, 2012). He is also the author of Privilege: Harvard and the Education of the Ruling Class (Hyperion, 2005), and the co-author, with Reihan Salam, of Grand New Party: How Republicans Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream (Doubleday, 2008).
The youngest op-ed columnist in the history of The New York Times, conservative commentator Douthat analyzes domestic and international politics and
government for the Times editorial pages. Formerly a senior editor and blogger at
The Atlantic, Douthat has written on topics ranging from higher education to national politics
to celebrities’ religious conversions. He has contributed to The Wall Street Journal, The Weekly Standard, and National Review, among other publications.
Hans A. von Spakovsky
Former Federal Election Commissioner, Manager of Election Law Reform Initiative, and
Senior Legal Fellow for The Heritage Foundation
"The Reality of Voter Fraud and How to Ensure Election Integrity"
Sept.r 29, 2014
Von Spakovsky said that voter fraud has plagued American elections since the founding, and that it continues to do so today. He proposed measures that states should take to deter, prevent, and detect fraud without inhibiting the ability of anyone who is eligible to register and vote. The experience of states that have implemented these election reforms shows, according to von Spakovsky, that the claims made by opponents of election reform are untrue, and that maintaining the confidence of the American electorate in the election process is of vital importance.
Von Spakovsky is co-author of Who’s Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk (Encounter Books, 2012). His analysis and commentary have appeared in many publications including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Politico, and Human Events. Von Spakovsky appears regularly on national and regional TV and radio news outlets.
Previously, von Spakovsky worked at the Justice Department providing expertise enforcing the Voting Rights Act and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. He is a former vice chairman of the Fairfax County (Va.) Electoral Board and a former member of the Virginia Advisory Board to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Von Spakovsky holds a BS from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a JD from Vanderbilt University School of Law.