- Meet the Team
- 20 Questions for Internal Audit
- Institutional Compliance Plan Manual
- Compliance and Privacy Office
- ADA/504 Compliance
- Anonymous Reporting Line
- Finance Office
- Finance and Audit Committee
- Internal Audit Plan
- Finance and Audit Committee Presentations
- UT Home Page
- ** New Links **
- Federal Title IV Financial Aid Reporting Requirements
- Retention Rate Information and Graduate and Professional Education
- Completion and Graduation Rate Information
- Gainful Disclosure Certificates
- U.S. Dept. of Education Federal Student Aid Federal Direct Loan Program Audit Report (2010-2011 program year)
- 2011-2012 Annual Financial Report with A133 (as submitted to The State of Ohio in October of 2012)
Scott Park Campus
Academic Services CenterRoom 2050 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Communication and understanding of each department’s roles and responsibilities within the selected process or function, including the roles and responsibilities of each individual that is part of the process or function.
• Determination of acceptable levels of risk.
• Determination of the correct cost-benefit trade-off for establishing new internal controls.
A CSA differs from an internal audit in that the direction of a CSA is determined by operating department management; the direction of an internal audit is determined by Internal Audit department management. Also, a typical internal audit includes testing of transactions to determine whether internal controls are operating as expected – a CSA typically does not include transaction testing within its scope of work.