NIH has released a set of recommendations to improve Peer Review, and the recommendations have been is
organized into the following four priority areas.
Engage the best reviewers: The excellence of peer review is directly correlated with the
ability to recruit and retain the most accomplished scientists to serve on NIH study sections.
Quality and transparency of review: The process of review should focus on the potential
impact, originality and feasibility of the proposed research.
Provide balanced and fair reviews across scientific fields and career stages, and reduce
administrative burden on applicants: Peer review should fairly evaluate proposals from all scientists, regardless of
their career stage or discipline and avoid bias towards more conservative and proven approaches at the expense of innovation
and originality.
Develop a permanent process for continuous review of peer review: The NIH peer review
process will commit to a continuous quality control and improvement process based on a rigorous and independent prospective
evaluation that favors innovative approaches to review and program management.