|
Deadline: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 |
|
|
|
The deArce Memorial Endowment Fund Program supports medically related research, education or public service projects. Funds support research and scholarly activity that will advance a faculty member’s professional career, position the faculty member for additional external support, or provide assistance in developing a promising research program. It is anticipated that this funding will foster cross-disciplinary research projects. The funds available are from an endowment, the value of which fluctuates with the market and determines the number of awards that can be made in any given year. The preparation of textbooks, instructional activities or construction projects are not eligible for support. Although there is no maximum limit to the award, requests generally should not exceed $25,000. Funds may support personnel, graduate student stipends, travel necessary to conduct research, equipment and supplies. If graduate stipends are awarded, a tuition waiver may be requested from the graduate dean. Assistant professors can apply for summer salary support (maximum support for six weeks’ summer salary and fringes). However, associate and full professors cannot apply for summer salary or release time. Funding will be available in May 2010 with all expenditures completed by 15 May 2011. Awardees must submit a written report to the Office of Research Development by 31 August 2011, summarizing the results of the project with a list of presentations, publications, and proposals directly resulting from the project. Proposals will be reviewed by the University Research Council. The evaluation process takes into consideration the faculty member’s rank and discipline. For assistant professors the most important consideration is the likelihood that a successful project will lead to a productive and meaningful research program and to self-sustaining, external support. Although preference will be given to tenure-track assistant professors, proposals from tenured and associate or full professors will also be considered. For associate and full professors, the proposal must explain how the project takes the individual into higher national stature in research or into a new and promising area capable of generating self-sustaining support. All applicants must clearly identify where they intend to submit proposals resulting from the proposed studies. For example, if proposals are intended for NIH, the type of proposal (R15/21/03/01) and institute must be identified.
|
|
Eligibility |
|
Full-time, tenured and tenure-track faculty who will be at the university during the 2010-2011 academic year are eligible to apply. Faculty in the College of Medicine are not eligible for these awards. A faculty member may not receive salary support from more than two awards over any five-year period from this and the Summer Research Awards and Fellowships Program.
|
|
Submission Requirements |
|
Proposals must be double spaced, font size 12 points or higher, and submitted as a single PDF file. The following information must be included: |
|
|
Applicants with proposals in the area of medical research and development are encouraged to apply ONLY to the deArce Memorial Endowment Fund Program. Such applications, if not selected as most meritorious for funding, may be eligible for support from the Summer Research Awards and Fellowships Program. |
|
Evaluation | |
|
Proposals that do not follow the above guidelines or do not meet eligibility criteria will not be accepted. Proposals will be reviewed by the Research Council, which may obtain additional reviews from individuals both on and off campus. Although the council represents a broad spectrum of expertise, it is important that the proposal be written in a way that communicates to an intelligent reader--but not necessarily one well-versed in the particular subject matter, as would occur if the proposal were submitted to a national competition.
| |
| Proposals will be rated as follows: | |
|
Excellent |
Indicative of highest technical skill (relative to the discipline) or scientific merit; high level of relevance to the discipline or area for which it is being submitted and likely to result in a contribution of some significance; contains a clear statement of purpose and has goals and objectives that are attainable within time and budgetary constraints; imparts strong impression that the investigator has the capacity to conduct the project as evidenced by his or her knowledge and related published work, training and previous research contributions. |
| Very Good |
Proposal worthy of support and likely to result in significant contributions, but questions exist relating to objectives, significance, methodology/approach, or outcomes. |
| Good | Supportable only if funds are available. Although the project appears worthy, major questions exist regarding its success or significance. |
| Fair | Has meritorious components but serious shortcomings. |
| Poor |
Has significant shortcomings and is not worthy of support. |
|
Submit one hard copy of your proposal with the signed cover sheet, plus the complete proposal as a single PDF file via E-mail or disk, no later than 3:00 PM on Tuesday, 19 January 2010, to Dr. Elsa Nadler, Office of Research Development, 3rd Floor, CCE Building, Health Science Campus, urafp@utoledo.edu or elsa.nadler@utoledo.edu. | |