The University of Toledo

Evaluation of Websites

Content:

• Is the audience clear?
• Is the content well-organized?
• Is the information unbiased and neutral?
• Is controversial data cited?
• Are conclusions consistent with the facts?
• Are any links provided reputable?
• Has the information been peer reviewed?

Author(s):

• Are (is) the author(s) identified?
• Do the authors have appropriate credential or educational background for the content?
• Are conflicts of interest stated?
• Is the purpose of the site educational and defined?

References/Documentation:

• Are references for each section cited?
• Are references complete?
• Are references from reputable sources?
• Are references from human work?

Design/Site Organization:

• Is the site easy to navigate and find information?
• Does the site have a map, index, search or help screen (s)
• Are there any disclaimers regarding the information?
• Does the site note that it is not intended to provide medical advice or replace a professional?

Date of Publication:

• Is the information current?
• Is the information updated and when was it last updated?

These criteria are adapted from Drug Information Resource and literature retrieval by Marie Abate, PSAP Book 5, 4th edition 2002